On Friday 11 May 2007 18:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Poor security of bind is imho similar superstition as it is > for sendmail: once in the past this software had some problem, > so now a lot of people think they should forever avoid using it...
If the OP doesn't need any bind-specific feature then why not use djbdns which has a better security track record. djb software are built from the ground up to be secure (as is possible), he also splits the "program" into smaller executables, each having a specific job thus making each of them secure a simpler task. Whilst bind and sendmail have made substantial efforts to be more secure, they are still built on legacy and bloated monolithic code. -- Crayon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
