Hi, On Mon, 21 May 2007 13:57:14 +0400 "Andrey Gerasimenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just curious: why nobody suggests to allow Portage to use the > preferred method of binary distros: emerge several interdependent > packages in one transaction. Because this just wouldn't work. They're not called "dependencies" without reason. Or is it a transactional rollback functionality you're talking about? > Just prepare the source for A and B and > compile both in any order. IMHO this is what the ideal system should > do. Certainly not. How do you want to link against a library that doesn't exist yet, even if theoretically you might be able to create a stub after running ./configure (for automake based build infrastructure)... -hwh -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
