* Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And then ? > > Hope that mozilla-launcher gets repaired by itself ? > > no? but if it works that way, it is not even defective.. It doesn't. Why do you assume it would ? <snip> > > Isn't it exactly the job of the bugwranglers to delegate > > bugs to the responsible persons ? > > and bug wranglers are just humans. And humans a) are not perfect > and b) sometimes make errors. Ok, no problem. But is that the fault of the reporter ? Obviously not. If a bug gets to the wrong dev, he simply kicks it back or directly to the right person. Trivial. > > Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of > > specific persons ;-O > > well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes > them too fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a > civil manner usually solves that. I'm some bit confused that the wranglers should do such decisions at all (if they're not also involved in the affected package). cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
