On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:48 -0500, Dan Farrell wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:18:58 +1200
> "Kent Fredric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/11/07, Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 21:13 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> > >
> > > > Genoo > Everything.
> > >
> > > given Everything = Gentoo + Debian + RedHat + ...,
> > > let EverythingElse = Everything - Gentoo;
> > >
> > > then
> > > Gentoo > Everything
> > > =~ Gentoo > Gentoo + EverythingElse
> > > =~ Gentoo - Gentoo > Gentoo + EveryThingElse - Gentoo
> > > =~ 0 > EverythingElse
> > > =~ EverythingElse < 0
> > >
> > > I agree!
> >
> > If that concept is a first, I suggest it go into
> > fortune-mod-gentoo-forums.
yes, I made it up just then.
> > That is certainly quote worthy imo :D
thanks.
> Oh, I don't know about that... "x > everything" doesn't seem like a
> very witty way to begin a quotable concept.
it did of course rely on the "given" by Kent Fredric, whether that is
provable or not is left as an exercise for the reader :)
cya,
--
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>
The 357.73 Theory:
Auditors always reject expense accounts
with a bottom line divisible by 5.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
