On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:41:05 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > The alternative would > > be to use a separate /boot and mess around with initramfs images to > > load / from LVM, which is extra hassle and another potential point of > > failure. > > Want my scripts? ;-)
I'd be interested to see them, although I like the idea of not depending on an initrd. As I no longer run a separate /boot, it wouldn't reduce my partition count either. > > > Why not put swap on LV also? > > > > No major reason, but it means I still have swap available when booting > > in single mode without LVM. > > AFAIK LV's are available in single mode. > > > I suppose it would be tidier to put swap on LVM too. > > In the end, it's a matter of personal taste, I guess. I like to have it > as flexible as possible. :-) It's not something I'd really given any thought. Now you mention it, I'd probably put swap on LVM next time. Still, my current setup means I can expand / by switching swap to LVM and adding the space to / :) -- Neil Bothwick Does fuzzy logic tickle?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
