I've held off on doing this gcc update as I'm on an old P4 2Ghz notebook
with 1G RAM (Dell i8200). Things are generally working okay (as well as
any linux/gentoo system can be I guess).

What is the compelling reason to update if any? I've masked out this new
GCC for many months and have had no "issues" thus far that I know of.

I absolutely dread dicking with this for days and days, fixing things
that currently work, merging all the /etc/ files with the "new" ones for
the same packages that will be simply re-compiled with the new GCC.

So my questions are:

[a] what compelling reason is there to upgrade (other than "you should
b/c it's stable")
[b] is it just better to d/l a new Gentoo .iso install that has all this
crap already, copy over my world file or whatever and have it install
the missing packages (apache, php, mysql, kde, gnome, etc)
[c] if I do that method, I would save the hassle of KDE and Gnome right?
As they come as binaries already?
[d] can I just "not fix if it aint broke" and keep with what I have? Or
is this just a question of time before I start hitting walls of new
packages I can't use. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Fish
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 3:13 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
> 
> On 9/8/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I could be entirely wrong on this, but I upgraded from 
> 3.4.6 to 4.1.1 and
> > did not re-emerge system or world.
> >
> > Actually, with all due respect, it is unnecessary to 
> recompile anything
> > other than the programs which depend on libstdc++.
> 
> Yeah, I thought this too.  And in fact, I also did a revdep-rebuild
> for the 4.1 upgrade and did not experience any problems between then
> and the time I eventually did an emerge -e world.  But check the
> archives of this list from around the time when gcc-4.1 hit ~arch, and
> you will see that that did *not* work for everybody.  We learned the
> hard way that the safe route is emerge -e world.
> 
> And it isn't just my say-so...the gentoo devs insist ([1] & [2]) that
> the emerge -e world is the only safe option.  They don't say these
> things because they want users to waste a bunch of time...
> 
> [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-493662.html
> [2] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-3541436.html#3541436
> 
> -Richard
> -- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> 
> 

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to