On Dec 25, 2007 6:26 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:57:10PM -0800, Jason Dusek wrote: > > On Dec 23, 2007 8:23 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Emerging haxml directly repeats the greedy performance... > > > > Does deleting the ebuild (not haxml, just that particular ebuild, as > > suggested by "manually remove the ebuild", make any difference? > > I took "manually remove the ebuild" to mean do all the remove steps > myself, but I don't have any idea what those steps are. Do you think > it means the actual haxml-1.13.2.ebuild file? I'd be willing to try > that, but that is the most recent ebuild.
Maybe you're reading it right, but it's not clear -- if you are supposed to remove HaXML by hand, it should have said "manually remove the package". When you say "Emerging HaXML directly repeats the greedy performance...", do you mean *unmerging* HaXML is not doable? You could try unmerging it and then re-emerging it. If you've already tried that, though, then I'll have to think of something else :) I'm using the same HaXML you are, actually. -- _jsn -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
