In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes: >On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Konstantinos Agouros wrote: >> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan McKinnon) writes:
>> >Most likely he doesn't have the correct module loaded int he kernel >> >> As I said, the fact that iptables -L (after a fresh reboot) does not >> do anything puzzles me a bit. What would be the right module in Your >> opinion? Also is there a kernel configuration option I might have >> overseen? >nat needs the following config at least: >Networking -> Networking Options -> Network packet filtering framework >(Netfilter) -> IP: Netfilter Configuration -> Full NAT >and the options below it >the modules that load on my machine after running that same iptbales >command are: >xt_tcpudp 3712 1 >iptable_nat 7812 1 >nf_nat 20524 1 iptable_nat >nf_conntrack_ipv4 18952 2 iptable_nat >nf_conntrack 66376 3 iptable_nat,nf_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4 >nfnetlink 6424 3 nf_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack >ip_tables 14284 1 iptable_nat >x_tables 15748 3 xt_tcpudp,iptable_nat,ip_tables This is what I have: Module Size Used by iptable_filter 6400 1 iptable_nat 10116 0 ip_tables 14404 2 iptable_filter,iptable_nat nf_nat 19116 1 iptable_nat x_tables 14084 2 iptable_nat,ip_tables nf_conntrack_ipv4 11908 2 iptable_nat nf_conntrack 53192 3 iptable_nat,nf_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4 nfnetlink 8088 3 nf_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack xt_tcpudp is the difference as it seems >alan >-- >Alan McKinnon >alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com >-- >gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list -- Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Otkerstr. 28, 81547 Muenchen, Germany. Tel +49 89 69370185 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Captain, this ship will not survive the forming of the cosmos." B'Elana Torres -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
