On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 01:47 +0000, Stroller wrote: > On 17 Mar 2008, at 18:10, James wrote: > > ... > > Wear leveling is *probably* built into the IDE to CF converter > > carrier board? > > Almost certainly not, I'd have thought. Aren't those boards just dumb > pin-convertors? CF cards "talk" IDE. > > Stroller.
Yes they are. Another thought crossed my mind today: Does wear leveling work if I create loopback devices (ext2-formatted) on FAT32? By the way: Why is wear leveling filesystem-dependent anyway? I would have thought it were working on blocks (like device mapper, cryptsetup, lvm and so on) and not on files.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
