On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:51 PM, William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have run it at times in the past - built in place OO has its problems, > but overall its more stable and faster than then the binaries. Its also > been a couple of years since my last try so I might have another look at > it. > > -- > William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Home in Perth! > >
I've read a while ago that the source compile of open office uses go-oo while the binary installation is the official OpenOffice (http://www.linux.com/feature/143570 - read the comments). <quote> Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 83.18.171.115] on August 08, 2008 09:11 AM actually, installing openoffice from source has a advantage - source package is from go-oo.org and binary is straight from openoffice.org. and they are way different - the one from go-oo.org has tons of patches which add extra features. </quote> Regards Dirk
