on Thursday 02/12/2009 Joost Roeleveld(jo...@antarean.org) wrote
 > On Thu, February 12, 2009 3:21 pm, Momesso Andrea wrote:
 > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:44:15PM +0100, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
 > >> On Thu, February 12, 2009 2:26 pm, John covici wrote:
 > >> > on Thursday 02/12/2009 Joost Roeleveld(jo...@antarean.org) wrote
 > >> >  > On Thu, February 12, 2009 2:05 pm, John covici wrote:
 > >> >  > > on Thursday 02/12/2009 Joost Roeleveld(jo...@antarean.org) wrote
 > >> >  > >  > On Thu, February 12, 2009 10:52 am, John covici wrote:
 > >> >  > >  > > Hi.  I just upgraded a gentoo system from about August 2008
 > >> to
 > >> >  > > current
 > >> >  > >  > > -- including updating baselayout and openrt and now  when I
 > >> boot
 > >> > I
 > >> >  > > get
 > >> >  > >  > > a series of messages quite early in the boot modprobe: fatal
 > >> > /sys is
 > >> >  > >  > > not mounted.  Eventually it does boot and all seems to work
 > >> with
 > >> > the
 > >> >  > >  > > exception of the script for my hsfmodem, but I am curious as
 > >> to
 > >> > what
 > >> >  > >  > > those message mean and if there is a way to fix them.
 > >> >  > >  > >
 > >> >  > >  > > Any assistance would be appreciated.
 > >> >  > >  >
 > >> >  > >  > Did you include sysfs support to your kernel and do you have a
 > >> >  > > directory
 > >> >  > >  > '/sys'? (SYSFS)
 > >> >  > >  > This can be found in: File systems / Pseudo filesystems in the
 > >> > kernel
 > >> >  > >  > configuration.
 > >> >  > >  >
 > >> >  > >  > The '/sys' filesystem is as important as '/proc' these days.
 > >> >  > >
 > >> >  > > The plot thickens -- by the time I log in after booting, /sys is
 > >> >  > > mounted with the correct file system.  Still very strange.
 > >> >  >
 > >> >  > Hmm... so, something does solve the problem you are seeing at the
 > >> >  > beginning later on.
 > >> >  > Did you update all the configuration files (including the ones in
 > >> >  > /etc/init.d/.. )?
 > >> >  > It could be that something there is not set correctly.
 > >> >  >
 > >> >  > For now, I am assuming the issue is in the boot-sequence/runlevel.
 > >> >  >
 > >> >  > Can you check which services are in your boot-runlevel?
 > >> >  > I have:
 > >> >  > bootmisc, checkfs, checkroot, clock, consolefone, hostname,
 > >> keymaps,
 > >> >  > localmount, modules, net.lo rmnologin and urandom.
 > >> >  > Think these are the default ones.
 > >> >  >
 > >> >  > Do you use an initrd? If yes, did you update this as well?
 > >> >
 > >> > I regenerated the initrd, but I am still using 2.6.20 kernel which I
 > >> > will update soon, but I wonder if this is the problem -- something
 > >> > wrong with the initrd, but regenerating did not fix it.  In my boot
 > >> > level I have
 > >> > bootmisc@
 > >> > consolefont@
 > >> > device-mapper@
 > >> > fsck@
 > >> > hibernate-cleanup@
 > >> > hostname@
 > >> > hwclock@
 > >> > keymaps@
 > >> > localmount@
 > >> > modules@
 > >> > mtab@
 > >> > net.lo@
 > >> > procfs@
 > >> > root@
 > >> > swap@
 > >> > sysctl@
 > >> > termencoding@
 > >> > urandom@
 > >> > in my sysinit I have
 > >> > devfs@
 > >> > dmesg@
 > >> > udev@
 > >>
 > >> Do you have "device-mapper" in your boot-level?
 > >> In that case, you might want to check which init-script mounts the
 > >> '/sys'
 > >> filesystem as this script requires the /sys filesystem to be mounted.
 > >>
 > >> May I ask why you have this added as I don't use it with my LVM drives.
 > >>
 > >
 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258442
 > 
 > Helpful, but only if OP is using module-init-tools 3.6, which is currently
 > in unstable for all archs.
 > 
 > John, can you please confirm which 'module-init-tools' version you are using?
Its 3.6 -- I have gone to complete unstable on that box.

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici
         cov...@ccs.covici.com

Reply via email to