On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Etaoin Shrdlu <shr...@unlimitedmail.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 22 February 2009, 23:28, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> > <concatenation of attributes of lines 1..n> <result of line n>
>> > <concatenation of attributes of lines 2..n+1> <result of line n+1>
>> > <concatenation of attributes of lines 3..n+2> <result of line n+1>
>> > <concatenation of attributes of lines 4..n+3> <result of line n+1>
>>
>> The above diagram is correct when the lines chosen is 3. I suspect
>> that I might chose 10 or 15 lines once I get real data and do some
>> testing but that was harder to show in this email. A good design for
>> me would be a single variable I could set. Once a value is chosen I
>> want to process every line in the input file the same way. I don't use
>> 5 lines sometimes and 10 lines other times. In a given file it's
>> always the same number of lines.
>
> Ok, try this for a start:
>
> BEGIN { FS=OFS=","}
>
> {
> r=$NF;NF--
> for(i=1;i<n;i++){
> s[i]=s[i+1]
> if(NR>=n)printf "%s%s",s[i],OFS
> }
> s[n]=$0;if(NR>=n)printf "%s,%s\n", s[n],r
> }
>
> Save the above code in a file (eg, program.awk) and run it with
>
> awk -v n=3 -f program.awk datafile.csv
>
> where the "n=3" part is to be replaced with the actual number of lines
> you want to group (eg, n=5, n=4, etc.)
>
> With your sample input and n=3, the above awk program produces the output
> you show.
>
>
Yeah, that's probably almost usable as it is . I tried it with n=3 and
n=10. Worked both times just fine. The initial issue might be (as with
Willie's sed code) that the first line wasn't quite right and required
some hand editing. I'd prefer not to have to hand edit anything as the
files are large and that step will be slow. I can work on that.
As per the message to Willie it would be nice to be able to drop
columns out but technically I suppose it's not really required. All of
this is going into another program which must at some level understand
what the columns are. If I have extra dates and don't use them that's
probably workable.
The down side is the output file is 10x larger than the input file -
roughly - and my current input files are 40-60MB so the output files
will be 600MB. Not huge but if they grew too much more I might get
beyond what a single file can be on ext3, right? Isn't that 2GB or so?
Thanks very much,
Mark
