2009/3/30 Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk>: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:17:00 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> > So every ebuild, in the tree and all overlays, was updated before the >> > split ebuilds were introduced? > >> I don't know the exact progress but I think the split ebuilds were >> introduced masked, then the dependencies have been adjusted >> accordingly. After the transition was done the ebuilds have been >> unmasked. > > OK, so the meta ebuild is just a safety net for those running ebuilds not > in the portage tree. >
Probably, but even overlays should consider changing the dependencies and use the advantage of the split ebuilds ;-) -- Regards, Daniel
