Harry Putnam <rea...@newsguy.com> writes:

> setup:
>   kernel-2.6.29-r2
>   gcc-4.3.2-r3
> procmail is one tool that is absolutely robust and I expected no
> trouble whatever emerging it... however the emerge is failing like
> as shown below.  I'm not sure what to do about getline.
>
> The only useflags that come up are one I set 
>  `mbox' 
> and one other
>  `-selenix'
>
> [...]
> ln ../src/procmail ../new/procmail
> i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 -march=i486 -pipe -fno-inline-functions   
> lockfile.c
> i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=i486 -pipe -fno-inline-functions   
> lockfile.o exopen.o sublib.o acommon.o mcommon.o authenticate.o lastdirsep.o 
> -o lockfile -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-O1   -lm -lnsl -ldl -lc
> ln ../src/lockfile ../new/lockfile
> i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 -march=i486 -pipe -fno-inline-functions   
> formail.c
> In file included from formail.c:25:
> formisc.h:20: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
> /usr/include/stdio.h:651: error: previous declaration of 'getline' was here
> make[1]: *** [formail.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory 
> `/var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/procmail-3.22-r10/work/procmail-3.22/src'
> make: *** [bins] Error 2
>  *
>  * ERROR: mail-filter/procmail-3.22-r10 failed.
>  * Call stack:
>  *               ebuild.sh, line   49:  Called src_compile
>  *             environment, line 2527:  Called die
>  * The specific snippet of code:
>  *       emake CC="$(tc-getCC)" || die
>  *  The die message:
>  *   (no error message)
>  *
>
>  * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
>    stack if relevant.
>
>  * A complete build log is located at
>    '/var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/procmail-3.22-r10/temp/build.log'.
>
>  * The ebuild environment file is located at
>  *'/var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/procmail-3.22-r10/temp/environment'.
>
>

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270551

HTH

-- 
Education is the process of casting false pearls before real swine.
                -- Irwin Edman
 - This message may be digitally signed: GPG KeyID:0x9D2FD6C8 || FNMT SSL cert

Reply via email to