On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:20:53 -0700, Grant wrote: > Anyway, the point of all this is to prevent an HD failure from > stopping the system. An SSD is much safer, right?
SSDs are still relatively new technology, so predicting failure rates is less reliable. What's wrong with using RAID-1? It's proven technology and totally resistant to a single HD failure. -- Neil Bothwick Why do Kennedy's cry after sex? ..... Mace!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature