On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:20:53 -0700, Grant wrote:

> Anyway, the point of all this is to prevent an HD failure from
> stopping the system.  An SSD is much safer, right?

SSDs are still relatively new technology, so predicting failure rates is
less reliable. What's wrong with using RAID-1? It's proven technology and
totally resistant to a single HD failure.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Why do Kennedy's cry after sex? ..... Mace!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to