Am Samstag 15 August 2009 19:25:39 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > A common misunderstanding is that you have to rebuild gcc twice. This is > not true as gcc's own build system in fact builds gcc three times and does > a binary diff between the last two, the build only proceeds if they are > bit-for- bit identical. So there is no need for portage to redo this as gcc > already did it.
That's exactly my point. Bye... Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.