Am Samstag 15 August 2009 19:25:39 schrieb Alan McKinnon:

> A common misunderstanding is that you have to rebuild gcc twice. This is
> not true as gcc's own build system in fact builds gcc three times and does
> a binary diff between the last two, the build only proceeds if they are
> bit-for- bit identical. So there is no need for portage to redo this as gcc
> already did it.

That's exactly my point.

Bye...

        Dirk

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to