James Ausmus wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com > <mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Jonathan Callen wrote: > > Dale wrote: > > > I would urge you to check into the "q" command and equery. I > !think! > > > the "q" command is part of portage. It may be part of > gentoolkit tho. > > > Just the "q" command has more than a dozen different things it > does. > > > equery can do a lot too but some say it has some "accuracy" > problems at > > > times. It works for my little simple stuff tho. > > > > Actually, /usr/bin/q belongs to app-portage/portage-utils, not > > app-portage/gentoolkit or sys-apps/portage. :) > > > > Thanks. I wasn't sure which package it belonged to. I had forgot > about > portage-utils. Still a good command for someone to look into tho. > > > > When you forget which package a command (or any random file) belongs > to, a great way to figure it out would be: > > equery belongs $(which q) > > ;) > > -James > > > > > Dale > > :-) :-) > >
I knew how to do it but I *thought* it would return a lot of hits from anything containing the letter "q". Later on when I had a little bit of time to sit here, I tried it. It only returned the one result. Still sort of surprised about that. I actually just ran equery b q . Neato ! It has a microscope and read my mind. o_O Dale :-) :-)
