Chris Reffett wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> On 10/19/2009 03:33 AM, Crístian Viana wrote: >>> hi! >>> >>> when I try to update virtualbox-ose-additions, portage says: >>> >>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy >>> "~app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8" have been masked. >>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your >>> request: >>> - app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8 (masked by: PUEL >>> license(s)) >>> A copy of the 'PUEL' license is located at >>> '/usr/portage/licenses/PUEL'. >>> >>> it suggests me to read the Gentoo Handbook, but it isn't updated. >>> >>> what should I do to unmask this package? I've never seen this kind of >>> masking. >> >> In make.conf: >> >> ACCEPT_LICENSE="*" >> >> to unmask all licenses. Or else name the licenses you wish unmasked >> one by one. >> >> >> > Yeah, they added this in a recent portage-2.2 rc. It masks end user > license agreements by default (-...@eula is the syntax, if I recall > correctly) > >
I checked make.conf.example and this is not documented yet. I'm on portage-2.2_rc46. Is it in a later version or did I miss something? The file I checked is here: /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example Just curious. Dale :-) :-)