Chris Reffett wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 10/19/2009 03:33 AM, Crístian Viana wrote:
>>> hi!
>>>
>>> when I try to update virtualbox-ose-additions, portage says:
>>>
>>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
>>> "~app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8" have been masked.
>>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
>>> request:
>>> - app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8 (masked by: PUEL
>>> license(s))
>>> A copy of the 'PUEL' license is located at
>>> '/usr/portage/licenses/PUEL'.
>>>
>>> it suggests me to read the Gentoo Handbook, but it isn't updated.
>>>
>>> what should I do to unmask this package? I've never seen this kind of
>>> masking.
>>
>> In make.conf:
>>
>>   ACCEPT_LICENSE="*"
>>
>> to unmask all licenses.  Or else name the licenses you wish unmasked
>> one by one.
>>
>>
>>
> Yeah, they added this in a recent portage-2.2 rc. It masks end user
> license agreements by default (-...@eula is the syntax, if I recall
> correctly)
>
>

I checked make.conf.example and this is not documented yet.  I'm on
portage-2.2_rc46.  Is it in a later version or did I miss something? 
The file I checked is here:

/usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example

Just curious.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Reply via email to