On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 01:52 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:48:22 William Kenworthy wrote: > > rattus ~ # eselect profile list > > Available profile symlink targets: > > [1] default/linux/x86/10.0 * > > [2] default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop > > [3] default/linux/x86/10.0/developer > > [4] default/linux/x86/10.0/server > > [5] hardened/linux/x86/10.0 > > [6] selinux/2007.0/x86 > > [7] selinux/2007.0/x86/hardened > > [8] selinux/v2refpolicy/x86 > > [9] selinux/v2refpolicy/x86/desktop > > [10] selinux/v2refpolicy/x86/developer > > [11] selinux/v2refpolicy/x86/hardened > > [12] selinux/v2refpolicy/x86/server > > rattus ~ # > > In almost all cases [2] or [4] is a better choice than [1] > > >
I wouldnt think so - I have a lot of server apps and desktop apps, even on my laptop and main server at home. I dont have such a thing as a pure server or a pure desktop so I stuck with this. I did change to desktop once on my laptop and didnt like the number of changes I would need to revert so didnt proceed. I my personal opinion is that having developer, server and desktop profiles for gentoo is just stupid. redhat/Mandrake etc have had this for a long time and they just are a way to start customising the system - dont save much at all. I guess the question is where do you start customising from? - a desktop, a server or gentoo 1.1b circa 1999 (if memory serves me correctly) which is where some of my systems (including the one above) started :) BillK