Jesús Guerrero wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:03:54 -0600, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that the Seamonkey Project has released Seamonkey 2.0. I >> assume this is the same one that is currently masked and keyworded in >> the tree. Is anyone using it already? Any problems? Lose any old >> emails or settings that you can notice? Problems with bugs or things >> not working? >> >> [OT sort of] My brother needs to upgrade soon and he is currently using >> windoze XP and Seamonkey 1. I tried to do a install the other day but >> it sort of ran into a issue of locking up part way through the install. >> He didn't lose anything but I did have to go back to the old version to >> get it working again. Anyone here run into a similar problem? I can't >> recall exactly where it locked up but it was only about 20% or so of the >> way through according to the little bar thingy. I plan to install Linux >> on his rig once all this KDE stuff gets sorted out. [/OT] >> >> Thinking about the upgrade, just looking to see if I should or not since >> it has some sort of conversion process going on. >> >> > For me it's working nicely, I use the ebuild in the mozilla overlay > though. However, I only use the browser, I compile it with moznocompose > moznoirc moznomail moznoroaming, so I don't know how the rest of the > components work. Some people have been complaining about the mail reader in > the seamonkey mailing list lately, so you might want to check the mails > there. >
Call me chicken, I'll wait a little bit to let them fix the bugs. I use almost the whole thing so I want to be sure it is safe. Thanks for the reply tho. Dale :-) :-)
