Mike Edenfield <kut...@kutulu.org> wrote:
> On 11/9/2009 9:41 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > If I remove the new ACCEPT_LICENSE="dlj-1.1" I added to make.conf
>
> So don't do that?
>
> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-java/sun-jre-bin" have been masked.
> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> > request:
> > - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.17 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
> > - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.16 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s), ~x86
> > keyword)
> > - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.15 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
> > - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.22 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
> > - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.21 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s), ~x86
> > keyword)
> > - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.20 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
> > - dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.19 (masked by: package.mask)
>
>
> One very old version is masked off because of security problems. Siz
> different subsequent versions are available as long as you accept the
> new license.
However, even though I accepted the license in make.conf it still wants
to install dev-java/icedtea6-bin-1.6.1 -- how do I fix this to get it to
continue with the sun product?
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
cov...@ccs.covici.com
