so tell me how come none of you quarter-brights have responded to the email where I say this problem has been fixed?
you want to help? answer me this: why did # /var/git/openrc/git pull --rebase update all init.d services except net.lo? That's today's scintillating question. On 12/1/09, Joshua Murphy <poiso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Maxim Wexler <maxim.wex...@gmail.com> wrote: >> We just want to help you -- that's what the police say before they tase >> your ass >> >> On 12/1/09, Maxim Wexler <maxim.wex...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> meh, you got nothing >>> >>> On 12/1/09, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 22:19:24 Neil Bothwick wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:57:58 -0700, Maxim Wexler wrote: >>>>> > Fine, then read what I say and, until you know better, believe it. >>>>> >>>>> OK, you're right, everyone else is wrong and there's no point in any of >>>>> us trying to help you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Wise Chinese man say: young tempestuous fellow need to bang head on rock >>>> many >>>> more time before lesson be learned. Allow young man to bang head, >>>> obviously >>>> he >>>> like. Maybe he get head rush? >>>> >>>> One day he'll realise that he has installed a combination of software >>>> packages >>>> that just does not do what suits him best. Then he will change it. Until >>>> then, >>>> well, many happy non-booting returns! >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com > > I *almost* feel sorry for you, after several people here have tried to > help, even WITHOUT you giving an actual direct error message that > you're receiving beyond the *expected* behavior of the fsck being > skipped on boot, and even despite your being belligerent toward > several of the most helpful people I've seen on the list overall. What > I do fail to understand, though, is why a person would post, asking > for help, disregard every bit of help given, and *both* act as though > they're being forced to listen to help they didn't ask for *and* as > though they're not getting any help at all. If someone gives you an > answer that is wrong for the situation as you see it, it typically > means one of two things... 1) you didn't give all the details needed > for them to understand what you're seeing and to know WHY the answer > they're giving isn't correct, which 2) you're overlooking or ignoring > something that they're trying to point out in their answer and, > despite what you may want to hear, they are in fact correct. Now, > a-typically, it's possible you know what's wrong, what's causing it, > and the solution, so you can instantly know that answers you're > receiving are wrong... but in my experience, in those cases, people > don't waste other people's time asking for help. > > -- > Poison [BLX] > Joshua M. Murphy > >
