>> It would be interesting to know whether hardware RAID would behave any
>> differently or allow the sync to perform in the background. I have
>> only 1.5TB in RAID5 across 4 x 500gb drives at present; IIRC the
>> expansion from 3 x drives took some hours, but I can't recall the
>> initial setup.

LSI, 3ware and Areca hardware raid controllers are capable of doing a
background init  but their performance is impacted, I can't speak on
other controllers as I haven't used them before.  I've built many
RAID6 arrays with all three controllers - 8x 1TB and 8x 1.5TB and I'll
usually start a foreground init and let them run overnight because it
does take a long time.  Also, RAID10 is much faster to get up and
running because it doesn't have to calculate parity.

-- 

Kyle

Reply via email to