On Sonntag 14 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Saturday 13 February 2010 14:07:05 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > I agree with the concept that people who don't want KDE dependancies, > > > > > > e.g. dbus, shouldn't use KDE apps. Therefore, I avoid amarok, > > > kaffeine, kplayer, etc. What got me started in this thread was the > > > fact that what had been a formerly-standalone media player > > > (audacious), now pretty much demands dbus. dbus would be "bundled in" > > > to my "basic service", i.e. ICEWM. > > > > #except that dsbus is not a KDE application. Just grep to portage tree > > for apps that use dbus. > > The result might be a bit shocking. > > > > Btw, do you have a car? But certainly you drive stick. Unsyncronized. > > Oy! What are you trying to say? > > All my cars are stick. Down here in deepest darkest Africa you pay a > premium for auto so no-one in their right mind buys them except old ladies > and trendy hippy naffs. And we need a clutch to get the car out of the > potholes that adorn the streets. > > The bikes are all crash boxes because all bikes are like that (except > Vespas and Chinese scooters, but I don't have any of those). On the track > the clutch is mostly pointless once you're moving. > > I highly recommend drivers to gain the skill of driving a vehicle > crash-style without a clutch. Comes in useful sometimes. > > :-)
the point was not stick but unsyncronized ;)