On Saturday 27 March 2010 00:57:31 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:39:51 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Redhat always was gnome shop for no good reasons at all. > > Wasn't it because of the not-very-free licensing of QT at the time?
No, that was the FSF's beef. As Volker said, Red Hat have never had a problem with proprietary bits. Personally I think they are just being pragmatic. RH probably chose Gnome as it is easier to ship a fully working out-the-box system with gnome. KDE has too many knobs -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
