----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Inspire compromise Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:45:44 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Dear colleague, Thanks for your message. I am indeed confident that Council and Parliament will come to agreement on this important directive because I am convinced that there is a general consensus behind the general aims of the directive. You will understand that I can't make detailed predictions about what the final compromise will look like on specific amendments. From the Commission's point of view (as expressed by Commissioner Dimas during the Plenary vote in June), amendment 21 is acceptable in principle and I would expect some compromise wording between the current Council and Parliament positions to be found. Amendment 27 is, again from the Commission point of view, acceptable in full. With best regards, Peter Wicks -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin Henrion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Henrion Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:35 PM To: WICKS Peter (ENV) Subject: Inspire compromise Dear Mr Wicks, I had the opportunity to met you after the announcement of the second reading on Inspire at the ENVI committee last march. It has been reported on a GI mailing-list that you were pretty confident about a possible agreement between the Council and the Parliament. Do you think the Council will accept amendments 21 and 27 of the EP? Or maybe the Parliament will give up its will of amending the Common Position? Best regards, -- Benjamin Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Benjamin Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 _______________________________________________ geo-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/geo-discuss
