Jo+others, I prepared a draft xsl table with my comments to Draft3. You may download it here: http://www.freegis-italia.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=48
Feel free to: - reuse it - provide me extra comments pg 2007/12/8, Jo Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > dear Benjamin, thankyou for reminding us all that the deadline on the > INSPIRE Metadata Implementing Rules consultation is 21st Dec, Just > over two weeks from now. > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > > http://www.ec-gis.org/inspire/ > > Inspire is the geodata directive of the EU. Benjamin Henrion was very > > active here. They propose metadata scheme and request input. > > Piergiorgio's last email on this subject has more detailed backgroun, > links, and a quick breakdown of the key points of interest. > http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/geo-discuss/2007-October/000342.html > I have written a bit recently about the updated metadata rules > (*not* a schema/format, but a set of properties and restrictions > on those properties, binding in law) below, but this is more an opinion > piece than a detailed analysis, re-looking at the Directive itself. > http://www.terradue.com/news/_news.asp?id=22 > > As this is a public consultation I've made no effort to collect > contributions from the broader open source (geo)informatics community > as was done during the last round of consultation. But I hope when the > Network Services draft Rules come out (currently scheduled for > January) we can repeat the process that went on at > http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Response_to_INSPIRE_Metadata_Draft > > I didn't know that FFII had an "open standards" activity and interest > group. Can you tell us a bit more about what it is doing to help > those of us working with open source and open data to help ourselves? > I see the outline at http://action.ffii.org/openstandards - > I don't see any contact details, or any background as to how the > members of the workgroup identified a range of standards as "fake". > > I'm also surprised to see so many ISO standards clearly identified as > "open" and "inclusive", and to see the FFII offering this > justification of the ISO's pay-to-play policy: [[ But specification > itself could cost a fair amount of money (ie. 100-400Eur per copy as > in ISO because copyright and publication of the document itself).]] > > ?? > > cheers, > > > jo > > > _______________________________________________ > geo-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/geo-discuss > -- Piergiorgio Cipriano [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("perchè la terra dei cachi è la terra dei cachi ..!")
_______________________________________________ geo-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/geo-discuss
