I see. Judging by the graphs, the server handles around 1000 successful results per minute or almost 17 per second. Which is lower than what I am seeing right now. Does that mean that I shouldn't expect any more gains? I understand the different factors influencing performance, but I'm more trying to get a grasp of the maximum I should be aiming at (on a dedicated system).
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Sarah Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:56:30PM +0100, Mathias Versichele wrote: > > using batch mode and experimenting with batch-size and the number of > > simultaneous batch requests, my geocoding speed seems to level out at > > around 25 addresses per second. Is it realistic to be still aiming for a > > considerable improvement ? Without going through the details, are there > any > > kind of benchmarking results available (sort of like the planet imports). > > I'm not aware of any systematic benchmarking. You can have a look at the > server stats for nominatim.osm.org at > > http://munin.osm.org/openstreetmap/pummelzacken.openstreetmap/index.html#nominatim > to get an idea how that server is doing. > > Note that query speed can be vastly different depending on the hardware you > have, what kind of area is imported and what kind of queries you have (even > what kind of format your search term has can make a huge difference). So > I'm > not even sure benchmarks could have more than anecdotic value. > > Sarah > -- Tel: +32 (09)/241.56.35 Mobile: +32 (0)485.16.07.08 <%2B32%20%280%29473.44.59.29> www.geointelligence.be <http://www.geointelligence.be/home-2/>
_______________________________________________ Geocoding mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/geocoding
