Hi Sarah, On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 07:56:25PM +0100, Sarah Hoffmann wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:30:45PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 07:13:44PM +0100, Sarah Hoffmann wrote: > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 07:36:16PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > > 54558 Winkel, Reimelshof 0, DE > > > > > > Are you sure that this the official address or are you just trying to > > > model that this house has no house number? In the latter case > > > addr:housename might be the better solution. > > > > I verified with the Germany Bundesamt e.g. Webatlas and yes - they say > > its "0". > > > > http://sg.geodatenzentrum.de/web_bkg_webmap/applications/webatlasde/webatlasde.html > > I wouldn't be surprised if that is simply because their software > wasn't specified for addresses without house number. (But I would > be even less surprised if some local authority gave out 0 house numbers > just because the address doesn't fit into their forms otherwise.) What do > the locals say, is the house number signed?
I found this address and the like because i have other datasets of a Big Telecoms Company in Germany which contains these addresses. So i tried to geocode them which failed - Then i entered the address and it still failed to geocode ;) So ALK and Companys actually use that address. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected] We need to self-defense - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Geocoding mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/geocoding
