Dear All,
 
I would also like to emphasise the importance that each year now is sort of 
record in the Arctic Ocean:
 
2007: remaining sea ice area 4.13 million km2 was 40% less than normal North 
Pole Sea Ice Cap. North West passage open 1st year.
 
2008: remaining sea ice volume and multi-year sea ice decreased to its all-time 
minimum. North West and North East Passages open simultaneously 1st year. 
Possible methane clatrate explosion heard on North West Passage several 
hundreds of kilometres away. Methane from sea beds and permaforst were both 
seen rising also on Russian coast and Spitzbergen where these had been studied. 
(See listed below with relevant links.)

2009: periphery melting of sea ice on record levels on Siberian and Alascan 
coast and around Greenland, probably second year possible to circumnavigate 
North Pole this summer.
 
With kind regads,
 
Veli Albert Kallio, FRGS
 
Frozen Isthmuses' Protection Campaign
of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans

 

 

There is urgency to do geoengineering because of these methane clathrate 
explosions and leakages now occurring.  Please note that sulphur emissions have 
been reduced from Kola Peninsula and currently SO2 emissions are being reduced 
in Taimyr peninsula where 500,000 inhabitant Norilsk heavy metal industries are 
based in Northernmost Siberia. 

 

Important is to avoid high localised concentrations of sulphur oxide that 
produces localised acidification, thus the hight and location out are very 
important and I would like to have our partner Atmosmare from Finland 
participating in major Arctic geoengineering projects.


 
Current Methane Leaking Events per Region:

 
 
1. Nunavut Archipelago, Canada (the NW Passage) - Sea Bed Explosions:

http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=689eefec-7d76-427e-b594-9504ee9ffe74&k=4938
 
 
 
2. East Siberian and Laptev Seas (Russia):
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/exclusive-the-methane-time-bomb-938932.html


http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/008702.html
 
 
  

3. The Swalbard, Norway (the Fram Straight):

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/hundreds-of-methane-plumes-discovered-941456.html


 

 
Here is the link passed my colleague Larry Donovan from our FIPC Edmonton 
office:
 
"Military probes mystery of whale deaths"

http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=689eefec-7d76-427e-b594-9504ee9ffe74&k=4938

It is obviously too early to draw conclusions, because the North West passage 
melted second year in a row 06/08/2008, and as it has never been regularly open 
(actually it had melted only once before some years ago), I think it is far 
more likely that it is methane clathrate or meteorite fall, than the Russian 
navy doing some secret explosion expriments in a Canadian territory as 
suggested by some. 
 
When Kursk blew up, it was a quite event, but Russia has so much coast, I don't 
think they blow things in Canada.  It just does not make any sense, Canadian's 
say it was not their submarine.
 








Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:37:43 +0100
From: j...@cloudworld.co.uk
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
CC: john.dav...@foe.co.uk; a...@env.leeds.ac.uk; john_g_sheph...@mac.com; 
robert.wat...@uea.ac.uk; d.j.l...@bristol.ac.uk; 
brian.laun...@manchester.ac.uk; ke...@ucalgary.ca; idd...@parliament.uk; 
steve.ray...@sbs.ox.ac.uk
Subject: [geo] Geoengineering seminar, House of Commons, London, 15th July


Event details here:
http://www.iom3.org/events/geo-engineering-challenges-and-global-impacts 

I fear that the potential side-effects of geoengineering (especially use of 
stratospheric aerosols) will be overstated, as they generally are by the media. 
 So I sincerely hope Dr Gadian and Dr Watson will not understate the 
potentially short-term global impact from not geoengineering: 



impact of Arctic warming (esp. methane release and Greenland ice sheet 
disintegration) if solar radiation management (SRM) is not used to cool the 
Arctic;

impact of increased CO2 (esp. global warming and ocean acidification) if CO2 
air capture is not used to reduce its level below 350 ppm.

BTW, I've just heard from Professor Shepherd that the Royal Society study on 
geoengineering is due out on Sept 1st, but will not include anything about 
using SRM specifically to cool the Arctic.

Cheers from Chiswick,

John

---

The Institute of Physics, the Royal Society of Chemistry and The Royal Academy 
of
Engineering invite you to attend a seminar entitled:

Geo-engineering: Challenges and global impacts

To be held at Portcullis House, the House of Commons
15 July 2009
Tea and coffee at 6:00pm.
The seminar will commence at 6.30pm and will be followed by refreshments at 
8.15pm.

The speakers at the seminar will be:
Dr Alan Gadian, University of Leeds
Talk: Cloud albedo modification
Dr Dan Lunt, University of Bristol
Talk: Sunshade engineering
Prof. Andrew Watson, University of East Anglia
Talk: Ocean fertilisation
Prof. Steve Rayner, University of Oxford
Talk: Social and ethical implications of geo-engineering
Chair
Dr Brian Iddon MP, the House of Commons


Geo-engineering offers the potential to protect the Earth’s ecosphere from the 
worst effects
of climate change. This protection may only be temporary and, in some cases, 
mask the
effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions rather than tackling the root 
cause.

Nevertheless, with growing doubt as to the ability, or willingness, of world 
economies to
meet the stringent cuts in emissions required, geo-engineering could become 
politically
attractive to buy more time for those deep cuts to be made.

This seminar will discuss a number of imaginative technologies that have been 
suggested to
modify the Earth’s albedo or sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide, which could 
be
sufficient to offset, in part, the effect of greenhouse gas emissions. These 
include dispersing
sulphate aerosols into the stratosphere to mimic global dimming, using a swarm 
of picosatellites
in space to reflect sunlight, and ocean fertilisation to encourage the growth of
marine microorganisms which can capture carbon dioxide. The seminar will 
explore whether
these techniques will have any unintended consequences (e.g. releasing sulphate 
aerosols
into the atmosphere may cause droughts), how they need to be developed and 
analysed for
risk potential, and whether altering the Earth’s climate system will ever be 
socially
acceptable. The scale of the interventions required will also be of concern as 
well as the full
life-cycle costs of proposals.

This seminar is the latest in a series demonstrating key routes by which 
contemporary
physics, chemistry and engineering will affect life in the 21st century.

The Institute of Physics is a scientific charity devoted to increasing the 
practice,
understanding and application of physics. It has a worldwide membership of over 
36 000
and is a leading communicator of physics-related science to all audiences, from 
specialists
through to government and the general public. Its publishing company, IOP 
Publishing, is a
world leader in scientific publishing and the electronic dissemination of 
physics.

The Royal Society of Chemistry is the largest organisation in Europe for 
advancing the
chemical sciences. Supported by a worldwide network of members and an 
international
publishing business, our activities span education, conferences, science policy 
and the
promotion of chemistry to the public.

The Royal Academy of Engineering is Britain’s national academy for engineering, 
bringing
together the country’s most eminent engineers from all disciplines to promote 
excellence in
the science, art and practice of engineering. Its strategic priorities are to 
enhance the UK’s
engineering capabilities, to celebrate excellence and inspire the next 
generation, and to
lead debate by guiding informed thinking and influencing public policy.

---




_________________________________________________________________
Get the best of MSN on your mobile
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/147991039/direct/01/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to