'Scary' climate message from past
By Richard Black
Environment correspondent, BBC News website
A new historical record of carbon dioxide levels suggests current
political targets on climate may be "playing with fire", scientists
say.
Researchers used ocean sediments to plot CO2 levels back 20 million years.
Levels similar to those now commonly regarded as adequate to tackle
climate change were associated with sea levels 25-40m (80-130 ft)
higher than today.
Scientists write in the journal Science that this extends knowledge
of the link between CO2 and climate back in time.
The last 800,000 years have been mapped relatively well from ice
cores drilled in Antarctica, where historical temperatures and
atmospheric content have left a series of chemical clues in the
layers of ice.
But looking back further has been more problematic; and the new
record contains much more precise estimates of historical records
than have been available before for the 20 million year timeframe.
Sustained levels
The new research was able to look back to the Miocene period, which
began a little over 20 million years ago.
At the start of the period, carbon dioxide concentrations in the
atmosphere stood at about 400 parts per million (ppm) before
beginning to decline about 14 million years ago - a trend that
eventually led to formation of the Antarctic icecap and perennial sea
ice cover in the Arctic.
" If anyone still doubts the link between CO2 and climate, they
should read this paper "
Jonathan Overpeck University of Arizona
The high concentrations were probably sustained by prolonged volcanic
activity in what is now the Columbia River basin of North America,
where rock formations called flood basalts relate a history of molten
rock flowing routinely onto the planet's surface.
In the intervening millennia, CO2 concentrations have been much
lower; in the last few million years they cycled between 180ppm and
280ppm in rhythm with the sequence of ice ages and warmer
interglacial periods.
Now, humanity's emissions of greenhouse gases are pushing towards the
400ppm range, which will very likely be reached within a decade.
"What we have shown is that in the last period when CO2 levels were
sustained at levels close to where they are today, there was no
icecap on Antarctica and sea levels were 25-40m higher," said
research leader Aradhna Tripati from the University of California at
Los Angeles (UCLA).
"At CO2 levels that are sustained at or near modern day values, you
don't need to have a major change in CO2 levels to get major changes
in ice sheets," she told BBC News.
The elevated CO2 and sea levels were associated with temperatures
about 3-6C (5-11F) higher than today.
No doubting
The data comes from the ratios of boron and calcium in the shells of
tiny marine organisms called foraminifera.
The ratio indicates the pH of sea water at the time the organisms
grew, which in turn allows scientists to calculate the carbon dioxide
content of the atmosphere.
The shell fragments came from cores drilled from the floor of the
Pacific Ocean.
According to Jonathan Overpeck, who co-chaired the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) work on ancient climates for the
organisation's last major report in 2007, this provides a more
accurate look at how past CO2 values relate to climate than previous
methods.
"This is yet another paper that makes the future look more scary than
previously thought by many," said the University of Arizona scientist.
"If anyone still doubts the link between CO2 and climate, they should
read this paper."
The new research does not imply that reaching CO2 levels this high
would definitely result in huge sea level changes, or that these
would happen quickly, Dr Tripati pointed out - just that sustaining
such levels on a long timescale might produce such changes.
"There aren't any perfect analogies in the past for climate change
today or in the future," she said.
"We can say that we've identified past tipping points for ice sheet
stability; the basic physics governing ice sheets that we've known
from ice cores are extended further back, and... I think we should
use our knowledge of the physics of climate change in the past to
prepare for the future."
Averting danger
At the Rio Earth Summit of 1992, governments pledged to stabilise
greenhouse gas concentrations "at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system".
What that level is has been the subject of intense debate down the
years; but one figure currently receiving a lot of support is 450ppm.
On Tuesday, for example, the International Energy Agency (IEA)
released its prescription for tackling climate change, which sees
concentrations of greenhouse gases peaking at the equivalent of
510ppm of CO2 before stabilising at 450ppm.
The Boxer-Kerry Bill, which has just entered the US Senate, also
cites the 450 figure.
"Trouble is, we don't know where the critical CO2 or temperature
threshold is beyond which ice sheet collapse is inevitable," said Dr
Overpeck.
"It could be below 450ppm, but it is more likely higher - not
necessarily a lot higher - than 450ppm.
"But what this new work suggests is that... efforts to stabilise at
450ppm should avoid going up above that level prior to stabilisation
- that is, some sort of 'overshoot' above 450ppm on the way to
stabilisation could be playing with fire."
Because of concerns about short-term sea level rise, the Association
of Small Island States (Aosis), which includes low-lying countries
such as The Maldives, Palau and Grenada, is pushing for adoption of
the much lower figure of 350ppm.
But with concentrations already substantially higher, political
support for that is scanty outside Aosis members.
richard.black-inter...@bbc.co.uk
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
