Dear geoengineering group,

I have been trying to respond to Eli Kintisch' ScienceInsider article for
three days.  Science has not been able to help me post a comment.  Because
Ken posted the article here and because most of those following this issue
are on this google group, I am posting my response here and will continue to
try to comment directly on Eli's blog:

--------------------

Eli, thank you for your coverage of the Climate Response Fund (CRF) and our
upcoming conference at Asilomar on risk assessment and management for
climate intervention technologies.
 
CRF decided some time ago not to make a formal press announcement about our
nonprofit (which was incorporated as a US 501c3 organization earlier this
year) or about the planned conference until after the Copenhagen climate
negotiations were completed.  We believe that the focus now should be on
support for the earliest and most aggressive possible emissions reductions,
and do not want to have discussion of our efforts on climate engineering
distract in any way from the important work at Copenhagen.

We want to assure you and your readers that we take the issue of conflict of
interest very seriously and have taken steps to eliminate conflicts:  I no
longer have a position, stock or a share of any intellectual property in
Climos.  No individual from Climos is on the board of CRF, an employee of
CRF or on our group of advisors.  We also have a strong organizational
conflict of interest policy that would prevent me from participating in any
decision to provide funds to Climos in the event that they would seek
funding.  The steps I have taken to separate myself and CRF from Climos meet
or exceed conflict of interest policies for the US federal government and
exceed those for most academic institutions (which allow intellectual
property to be held by researchers while actively performing research in the
same area) and most peer-reviewed publications (which do not require
disclosure of financial interests other than the source of funding for the
material being published) as well as conform with best practices in the
nonprofit community. In addition we have not accepted donations from
individuals or groups that would profit financially from climate engineering
technologies.

If you or your readers want to suggest further steps to avoid conflict we
are very happy hear comments.

Margaret Leinen
Founder and CEO, Climate Response Fund


--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=.


Reply via email to