>> "I am pretty sure the term is already included in models, and I don’t know >> of any reason to think that it is increasing—certainly not in comparison to >> the increased heat from the surface due to warming and the meltwater that in >> flowing down into the ice sheet is carrying heat (i.e., meltwater) well down >> into the ice and likely all the way to the base. <<
Hi, In our models the disequilibrium between the West Antarctic Ice Sheet which is losing weight, and the East Antarctic Ice Sheet that is gaining weight is creating ice sheet balance disequilibrium. In our view, this raises ground pressure under East Antarctica and decreases it under the West Antarctica. As the volume beneath the East Anatrctica is under increased compressional stresses, the displacement of liquids should drive these towards the West Antarctica if suitable conduits and connectivity between areas exists. If so, there should be volcanic activities increasing under the West Antarctic ice sheet. I have suggested that the Pine Island Glacier might be a recipient of displaced volcanic liquids beneath its ice sheet as it has less pressure while the East Antarctica has more and would have a tendency to drive out liquids from beneath ground, if they can find way out. When volcanism under ice sheet melts ice away, and the water drains to sea, more displaced volcanic rocks could move in and melting of the ice sheet like Pine Island is very fast and could end up in a sudden burst of lava flood. In our UN complaint, one issue is the isostatic ground-carrying-capacity being exceeded by ice accummulation (as in case of ice sheets there is a lack of geological driver, tectonic uplift, to support accummulation of tall grounds). When isostatic ground carrying capacity is exceeded, the base and grounds under ice sheets rapidly sink down. This leads the periphery of ice sheet (where ice is much thinner) starting to bulge out at the time when the ground-carrying-capacity under the thicker parts of the ice dome have been lost by excessive ground pressures. The interior subsidence of ice sheet creates a temporary tectonic uplift on the thin edges of ice sheet. This according to World Indigenous Nations' complaint, fed volcanic materials and caused the 'rapid ice age'. (The initial ice sheet was lost due to geothermal heat penetration from crevasses within fractured bed rocks leading to Eemian Interval. I do not elabore full view of the First Nations ideas of the fast ice age.) Only in Antarctica which is very large area in size for glacier, the middle was forced to bulge up generating Gamburtsev rise, while the pressure on the edges were down. Greenland is smaller and its edges gave away just like in Scotland, Norway and Kara Sea. So, without taking the base heat discussion too much to the First Nations complaints at the United Nations, I would like to point to the possibility that the ice sheet mass balance can cause liquid displacements where there is movement of equilibrium states. Kr, Albert Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:18:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [geo] Greenland ice sheet - tipping in progress From: mmacc...@comcast.net To: r2007...@gmail.com; j...@cloudworld.co.uk CC: Geoengineering@googlegroups.com; john.dav...@foe.co.uk; oliver.tick...@kyoto2.org; m.hu...@uea.ac.uk; albert_kal...@hotmail.com I am pretty sure the term is already included in models, and I don’t know of any reason to think that it is increasing—certainly not in comparison to the increased heat from the surface due to warming and the meltwater that in flowing down into the ice sheet is carrying heat (i.e., meltwater) well down into the ice and likely all the way to the base. Best, Mike MacCracken On 11/18/09 7:12 AM, "Raymond Law" <r2007...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi everybody, Why has no one mentioned one possible causes of the melting/sliding of the major and thick Greenland's ice sheet could be due to the minute temperature changes (primarily, warming up) of the earth/ground beneath ? Or have I missed out on this ? Comments and advices, please ! Raymond Law On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:04 PM, John Nissen <j...@cloudworld.co.uk> wrote: Hi all, Professor Mike Hulme gave a talk at the RGS yesterday evening [1], in which the Greenland ice sheet was shown as a tipping point, along with a dozen others on a map of the world [2]. The BBC article below shows how positive feedbacks are building up in the Arctic. What is not discussed is whether the whole sections of ice sheet could become unstable and slip off into the sea, causing a massive step change in sea level, as shown to have happened from time to time in the geological record of the Ice Ages [3]. If we are to avoid a complete tipping of this system, sooner or later giving us 7 metres of sea level rise, there seems to be no alternative to geoengineering to cool the Arctic. And the sooner we start the geoengineering, the more likely we are to succeed in halting the tipping process. >From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8357537.stm --- The Greenland ice sheet is losing its mass faster than in previous years and making an increasing contribution to sea level rise, a study has confirmed. Published in the journal Science, it has also given scientists a clearer view of why the sheet is shrinking. The team used weather data, satellite readings and models of ice sheet behaviour to analyse the annual loss of 273 thousand million tonnes of ice. Melting of the entire sheet would raise sea levels globally by about 7m (20ft). For the period 2000-2008, melting Greenland ice raised sea levels by an average of about 0.46mm per year. If you multiply these numbers up it puts us well beyond the IPCC estimates for 2100 Professor Roger Barry Since 2006, that has increased to 0.75mm per year. "Since 2000, there's clearly been an accelerating loss of mass [from the ice sheet]," said lead researcher Michiel van den Broeke from Utrecht University in the Netherlands. "But we've had three very warm summers, and that's enhanced the melt considerably. "If this is going to continue, I cannot tell - but we do of course expect the climate to become warmer in the future." In total, sea levels are rising by about 3mm per year, principally because seawater is expanding as it warms. Sea change Changes to the Greenland sheet and its much larger counterpart in Antarctica are subjects commanding a lot of interest within the scientific community because of the potential they have to raise sea levels to an extent that would flood many of the world's major cities. CLIMATE CHANGE GLOSSARY Select a term from the dropdown: Glossary Adaptation Annex I countries Annex II countries Anthropogenic climate change Atmospheric aerosols Bali action plan Bali roadmap Baseline for cuts Black carbon Boxer-Kerry bill Business as usual Cap and trade Carbon capture and storage (CCS) Carbon dioxide (CO2) Carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent Carbon intensity Carbon leakage Carbon neutral Carbon offsetting Carbon sequestration Certified Emission Reduction (CER) Clean Coal Technology Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Climate change CFC CO2 COP15 Dangerous climate change Deforestation Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) EU Burden-sharing agreement Fossil_fuels Geological sequestration Global average temperature Global energy budget Global dimming Global warming Greenhouse gases (GHGs) Greenhouse effect IPCC Joint implementation Kyoto Protocol Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate Methane Mitigation Natural greenhouse effect Non-annex I countries Per-capita emissions Pre-industrial levels of carbon dioxide REDD Stern review Technology transfer UNFCCC Waxman-Markey energy bill Weather Climate change - A pattern of change affecting global or regional climate as measured by yardsticks such as average temperature and rainfall, or an alteration in frequency of extreme weather conditions. This variation may be caused by both natural processes and human activity. Global warming is one aspect of climate change. Suggest additions <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8329823.stm> Glossary in full <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8314171.stm> The 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report projected a sea level rise of 28-43cm during this century. But it acknowledged this was almost certainly an underestimate because understanding of how ice behaves was not good enough to make reliable projections. By combining different sources of data in the way it has, and by quantifying the causes of mass loss, the new study has taken a big step forwards, according to Roger Barry, director of the World Data Center for Glaciology at the University of Colorado in Boulder, US. "I think it's a very significant paper; the results in it are certainly very significant and new," he said. "It does show that the [ice loss] trend has accelerated, and the reported contribution to sea level rise also shows a significant acceleration - so if you multiply these numbers up it puts us well beyond the IPCC estimates for 2100." Professor Barry was an editor on the section of the IPCC report dealing with the polar regions. On reflection An ice sheet can lose mass because of increased melting on the surface, because glaciers flow more quickly into the ocean, or because there is less precipitation in the winter so less bulk is added inland. The new research shows that in Greenland, about half the loss comes from faster flow to the oceans, and the other half from changes on the ice sheet itself - principally surface melting. The Grace satellites provide a twin eye on gravity at the Earth's surface Another analysis of satellite data, published in September, showed that of 111 fast-moving Greenland glaciers studied, 81 were thinning at twice the rate of the slow-moving ice beside them. This indicates that the glaciers are accelerating and taking more ice into the surrounding sea. Melting on the ice sheet's surface acts as a feedback mechanism, Dr van den Broeke explained, because the liquid water absorbs more and reflects less of the incoming solar radiation - resulting in a heating of the ice. "Over the last 10 years, it's quite simple; warming over Greenland has caused the melting to increase, and that's set off this albedo feedback process," he told BBC News. "Quite likely the oceans have also warmed, and it's likely that explains the [acceleration of] outlet glaciers because they're warmed from below." Data provided over just the last few years by the Grace satellite mission - used in this study - is giving researchers a closer view of regional variations across the territory. Grace's twin satellites map gravity at the Earth's surface in unprecedented detail; and it is now possible to tease out from the data that most of the mass is being lost in the southeast, southwest and northwest at low elevations where the air will generally be warmer than at high altitudes. Professor Barry cautioned that the Grace mission, which has produced valuable data about Antarctica as well as Greenland, has only a further two years to run, and that no replacement is currently scheduled. --- For graphic illustration of what we're facing, I can recommend James Balog's time-lapse photography: http://www.ted.com/talks/james_balog_time_lapse_proof_of_extreme_ice_loss.html Cheers from Chiswick, John [1] RGS lectures http://www.rgs.org/WhatsOn/London+Lectures/Monday+night+Lectures.htm [2] Tipping points map http://web.me.com/stewartbrand/DISCIPLINE_footnotes/Tipping_points.html [3] Hansen on scientific reticence and sea level rise http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1748-9326/2/2/024002/erl7_2_024002.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineer...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <mailto:geoengineering%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineer...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineer...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=. _________________________________________________________________ Use Hotmail to send and receive mail from your different email accounts http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394592/direct/01/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineer...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=.
<<attachment: image.gif>>
<<attachment: image.gif>>
<<attachment: image.gif>>
<<attachment: image.jpg>>
