Yes, completely supplanting fossil fuel is indeed a pipe dream, but someday 
will be a necessity if we survive that long. Still, in reading the fine print 
in this paper the ratio of CO2 consumed to lipid produced is generally >0.6, a 
figure I find remarkably high. The incubations were conducted at 37 deg C so 
that precludes the use of ambient T in most places without genetic engineering, 
esp in mitigating Arctic methane.  They also found that the use of methane to 
make lipid was dissimilative, meaning that the carbon is not assimilated and 
does not become part of the biomass.  The use of the term "methanotrophy" to 
describe methane consumption therefore now needs to be used with great caution 
unless further evidence is provided. This is an example of methane oxidation 
providing energy for autotrophic CO2 fixation – a form of chemoautotrophy
Greg

From: "euggor...@comcast.net<mailto:euggor...@comcast.net>" 
<euggor...@comcast.net<mailto:euggor...@comcast.net>>
Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 11:42 AM
To: Default <r...@llnl.gov<mailto:r...@llnl.gov>>
Subject: Re: [geo] Coupled CH4 and CO2 Mitigation?

Supplanting fossil sources is a pipe dream at least in the US. Getting rid of 
CO2 and CH4 would be an interesting experiment. If it actually reduces global 
temperature it would be a real plus.

________________________________
From: "Greg Rau" <r...@llnl.gov<mailto:r...@llnl.gov>>
To: "geoengineering" 
<geoengineering@googlegroups.com<mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:01:07 PM
Subject: [geo] Coupled CH4 and CO2 Mitigation?

Sorry if this is old news, but in cleaning out my in box I came across this 
interesting 2012 paper – anaerobic methane oxidation also consumes CO2.  So 
with a bit of biogeoengineering we can pro-actively mitigate CH4 and CO2 
simultaneously, +/- take the lipid-rich biomass to produce biofuels, 
supplanting fossil sources???
Greg



Autotrophy as a predominant mode of carbon fixation in anaerobic 
methane-oxidizing microbial communities

  1.  Matthias Y. 
Kellermann<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Matthias+Y.+Kellermann&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>a<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-1>,1<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#fn-3>,2<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#fn-4>,3<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#corresp-1>,
  2.  Gunter 
Wegener<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Gunter+Wegener&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>b<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-2>,c<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-3>,1<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#fn-3>,
  3.  Marcus 
Elvert<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Marcus+Elvert&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>a<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-1>,
  4.  Marcos Yukio 
Yoshinaga<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Marcos+Yukio+Yoshinaga&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>a<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-1>,
  5.  Yu-Shih 
Lin<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Yu-Shih+Lin&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>a<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-1>,
  6.  Thomas 
Holler<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Thomas+Holler&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>c<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-3>,
  7.  Xavier Prieto 
Mollar<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Xavier+Prieto+Mollar&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>a<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-1>,
  8.  Katrin 
Knittel<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Katrin+Knittel&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>c<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-3>,
 and
  9.  Kai-Uwe 
Hinrichs<http://www.pnas.org/search?author1=Kai-Uwe+Hinrichs&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>a<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#aff-1>

+<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full> Author Affiliations

1.     aOrganic Geochemistry Group, MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental 
Sciences and Department of Geosciences, University of Bremen, D-28359 Bremen, 
Germany;
2.     bAlfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research Group 
for Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany; and
3.     cMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, D-28359 Bremen, Germany

1.     Edited by Donald E. Canfield, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, 
Denmark, and approved October 5, 2012 (received for review May 24, 2012)

Next Section<http://www.pnas.org/content/109/47/19321.full#sec-1>
Abstract

The methane-rich, hydrothermally heated sediments of the Guaymas Basin are 
inhabited by thermophilic microorganisms, including anaerobic methane-oxidizing 
archaea (mainly ANME-1) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (e.g., HotSeep-1 
cluster). We studied the microbial carbon flow in ANME-1/ HotSeep-1 enrichments 
in stable-isotope–probing experiments with and without methane. The relative 
incorporation of 13C from either dissolved inorganic carbon or methane into 
lipids revealed that methane-oxidizing archaea assimilated primarily inorganic 
carbon. This assimilation is strongly accelerated in the presence of methane. 
Experiments with simultaneous amendments of both 13C-labeled dissolved 
inorganic carbon and deuterated water provided further insights into production 
rates of individual lipids derived from members of the methane-oxidizing 
community as well as their carbon sources used for lipid biosynthesis. In the 
presence of methane, all prominent lipids carried a dual isotopic signal 
indicative of their origin from primarily autotrophic microbes. In the absence 
of methane, archaeal lipid production ceased and bacterial lipid production 
dropped by 90%; the lipids produced by the residual fraction of the 
metabolically active bacterial community predominantly carried a heterotrophic 
signal. Collectively our results strongly suggest that the studied ANME-1 
archaea oxidize methane but assimilate inorganic carbon and should thus be 
classified as methane-oxidizing chemoorganoautotrophs.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to 
geoengineering@googlegroups.com<mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to