This is apparently from the upcoming IPCC Mitigation volume, or something else? 
CDRer's mount up?
Greg
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/environment/climate-change/sucking-co2-from-atmosphere-may-be-only-way-to-meet-climate-goals-un-report-says-20140116-30vnr.html
Sucking CO2 from atmosphere may be only way to meet climate goals, UN report 
says

Published: January 16, 2014 - 5:51AM

Advertisement

Governments may have to extract vast amounts of greenhouse gases from the air 
by 2100 to achieve a target for limiting global warming, backed by 
trillion-dollar shifts towards clean energy, a draft U.N. report showed on 
Wednesday.

A 29-page summary for policymakers, seen by Reuters, says most scenarios show 
that rising world emissions will have to plunge by 40 to 70 per cent between 
2010 and 2050 to give a good chance of restricting warming to U.N. targets.

The report, outlining solutions to climate change, is due to be published in 
Germany in April after editing by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 
(IPCC). It will be the third in a series by the IPCC, updating science from 
2007.

It says the world is doing too little to achieve a goal agreed in 2010 of 
limiting warming to below 2 degrees above pre-industrial times, seen as a 
threshold for dangerous floods, heatwaves, droughts and rising sea levels.

To get on track, governments may have to turn ever more to technologies for 
"carbon dioxide removal" (CDR) from the air, ranging from capturing and burying 
emissions from coal-fired power plants to planting more forests that use carbon 
to grow.

Most projects for capturing carbon dioxide from power plants are experimental. 
Among big projects, Saskatchewan Power in Canada is overhauling its Boundary 
Dam power plant to capture a million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year.

And, if the world overshoots concentrations of greenhouse gases in the 
atmosphere consistent with the 2C goal, most scenarios for getting back on 
track "deploy CDR technologies to an extent that net global carbon dioxide 
emissions become negative" before 2100, it says.

Temperatures have already risen by 0.8C since the Industrial Revolution.

Bioenergy

To limit warming, the report estimates the world would have to invest an extra 
$US147 billion ($164 billion) a year in low-carbon energies, such as wind, 
solar or nuclear power from 2010 to 2029.

At the same time, investments in fossil fuel energy would have to be reduced by 
$US30 billion annually. And several hundred billion dollars a year would have 
to go on energy efficiency in major sectors such as transport, buildings and 
industry.

By contrast, it said that global annual investments in the energy system are 
now about $US1.2 trillion.

And it says there are huge opportunities for cleaning up, for instance by 
building cities that use less energy for a rising world population. "Most of 
the world's urban areas have yet to be constructed," it says.

Overall, the report estimates that the costs of combating global warming would 
reduce global consumption of goods and services by between 1 and 4 per cent in 
2030, 2-6 per cent in 2050 and 2-12 per cent in 2100, compared to no action.

The IPCC said in September that it is at least 95 per cent probable that human 
activities, led by the burning of fossil fuels, are the dominant cause of 
global warming since the 1950s, up from 90 per cent in a 2007 assessment.

The world has agreed to work out a global U.N. deal by the end of 2015, 
entering into force from 2020, to fight climate change. But progress has been 
sluggish.

"Global greenhouse gases have risen more rapidly between 2000 and 2010," the 
draft says, with greater reliance on coal than in previous decades. China, the 
United States and the European Union are the top emitters.

The IPCC cautioned that the findings in the draft, dated Dec. 17, were subject 
to change. "This is a work in progress which will be discussed and revised in 
April," said Jonathan Lynn, spokesman for the IPCC in Geneva.

The report adds many details to earlier drafts. The IPCC's credibility suffered 
in 2007 after one of its reports wrongly said that Himalayan glaciers could all 
melt by 2035, centuries earlier than experts reckon.

The draft says that only the most radical curbs outlined in an IPCC report in 
September would give a better than 66 per cent chance of keeping temperature 
rises below 2C. The scenario corresponds to greenhouse gas concentrations of 
430 to 480 parts per million in the atmosphere - up from about 400 now.

Reuters

This story was found at: 
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/environment/climate-change/sucking-co2-from-atmosphere-may-be-only-way-to-meet-climate-goals-un-report-says-20140116-30vnr.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to