Hi thanks for this. Perhaps it is a cultural or translation issue, but 'outlandish' is quite an 'outlandish' word for a scientific paper. - I am struck by the application of this term for painting roofs white, OIF and mirrors in space because taking these examples, we do all of these things already: We have, i dont know how many, black rooves in the world already(why is white worse); We pump sewage and drain fertiliser from the land around the world in I dont know what quantity daily in very concentrated time and space in inshore waters which are much more vulnerable (fertilising the ocean in shallow seas with low water exchange often); And we pump i dont know how much dust into the atmosphere daily, globally, on a rather large scale. On top of these, we are already doing an amazing amount of other things to Earth on the most incredible scale. And we dont seem to be able to agree to stop. I am not sure i understand why efforts with the intention of being positive are viewed so negatively when things we do in full knowledge of their negative impacts are allowed to continue and increase with little or no successful strategies to stop them. Best wishes, Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2 -----Original Message----- From: Oscar Escobar <oscar2000esco...@gmail.com> Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:24:12 To: <geoengineering@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: oscar2000esco...@gmail.com Subject: [geo] Geoengineering in a World Risk Society - By Tina Sikka. Hello all, A short intro about me. My name is Oscar Escobar, I blog about geoengineering (climate engineering) here: A #Geoengineering #Climate Issues Blog - Geoingeniería Geoengineering - Climate Engineering from a layman's critical perspective. http://geoengineeringclimateissues.blogspot.com/ Previously I described myself as 'opposed' to geoengineering. This continuesto be largely accurate in the case of SRM and OIF deployment. But I do think that more public knowledge is important for all concerned. Twitt here: @oscare2000 https://twitter.com/oscare2000 paperli http://paper.li/oscare2000/1347466963 This article by Tina Sikka stroke a chord with me, I am posting it here hoping it helps in broadening the conversation, best regards, Oscar Escobar Lakeland, FL - EEUU *Geoengineering in a World Risk Society* By Tina Sikka. (Full paper in academia.edu (scroll down a few pages) https://www.academia.edu/5672333/Geoengineering_in_a_World_Risk_Society Abstract: http://ijc.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.185/prod.126 Published by The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses In the following paper, I draw on Ulrich Beck’s model of the world risk society to examine, unpack and critique geoengineering technologies. Briefly, geoengineering can be defined as large-scale technological interventions into the environment in an attempt to mitigate or even reverse climate change. They include such proposals as painting the surfaces of buildings white to reflect the sun’s rays, placing mirrors in space for similar ends or the more interventionist seeding of oceans with iron in order to encourage the growth of carbon absorbing algae blooms. What is startling about geoengineering is that despite its seeming outlandishness, it has recently been seriously considered by a number of governments, corporations, research institutes and professional scientific bodies. In an attempt to better understand and appreciate the possible normative, political, economic and environmental consequences of such large-scale technological interventions, I have found Beck’s thesis of reflexive modernity and the world risk society to be particularly useful and illuminating. Essentially, Beck’s thesis is that we live in a world that distinguished from the past by the extent to which it is constituted by global technological risks that one, tears down traditional boundaries between people and their environments (de-localization); two, resists anticipation by conventional scientific and/or rational means; three, denies compensation or insurability against danger; and four, re-orients social attention to the constant anticipation of catastrophe. These risks, as Beck argues, “represents a shock for the whole of humanity” who never could have anticipated “the self-destructiveness–not only physically but also ethical–of unleashed modernity” (Beck, 2006, p. 330). In applying these insights to geoengineering, it becomes clear that these technologies are, by definition, risk technologies. I argue that it is their inherently global, unpredictable, uninsurable and potentially catastrophic character, which can be both inimitable, frightening, which renders them in need of further study. As such, in undertaking an examination of these questions, I have chosen to divide this article into the following sections: I begin with a brief introduction to geoengineering technologies and discuss not only what they are and what they are supposed to do. Following this, I delve into a more considered discussion of how geoengineering technologies are in fact risk technologies as Beck defines them. I begin with an overview of reflexive modernization, followed by discussions Beck’s concepts of risk, insurability and responsibility, and subpolitics, which I use to examine geoengineering in turn. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
