Weitzman

http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/weitzman/files/voting.architecture.free_.driver.v2_1.8.14.pdf


might write saying that this has no parallel with CDR



On Sep 12, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Andrew Lockley <andrew.lock...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjoe.12120/abstract
> 
> Keywords:
> Climate change;international public goods;supermajority rule;F51;H41;Q54
> 
> Abstract
> Abating climate change is an enormous international public-goods problem with 
> a classical “free-rider” structure. However, it is also a global 
> “free-driver” problem because geoengineering the stratosphere with reflective 
> particles to block incoming solar radiation is so cheap that it could 
> essentially be undertaken unilaterally by one state perceiving itself to be 
> in peril. This exploratory paper develops the main features of a free-driver 
> externality in a simple model motivated by the asymmetric consequences of 
> type-I and type-II errors. I propose a social-choice decision architecture, 
> embodying the solution concept of a supermajority voting rule, and derive its 
> basic properties.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to