http://www.lexxion.de/en/verlagsprogramm-shop/details/3721/295/cclr/cclr-2/2013/tackling-climate-change--where-can-the-generic-framework-be-located?.html

Matthias Honegger, Kushini Sugathapala and Axel Michaelowa

Tackling Climate Change: Where Can the Generic Framework Be Located

Carbon and Climate Law Review 2/2013: pp. 125-135

Abstract

International negotiations on climate change under the UNFCCC are
increasingly burdened by the gap between low political will to engage in
emissions mitigation and the level of mitigation required for limiting
warming to 2°C. Given the growing understanding that mitigation will be
insufficient, adaptation has recently gained in importance – a step
sometimes seen as a portent of other actions on climate yet to come such as
climate engineering. Existing international treaties such as the Convention
on Biodiversity or the London Convention limit climate engineering
interventions but do not provide clear guidance for acceptable solutions.
Given their objectives – preserving biodiversity and the integrity of
oceans – are jeopardised by insufficient action on climate change, they
should become more specific in this regard and avoid conflicts with other
conventions. The UNFCCC could pursue any approach in line with the
overarching principle in Article 2 of the Convention – to achieve
“stabilisation of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a
level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system”. An interpretation beyond reductions of anthropogenic
emissions could include climate engineering in form of carbon removal and
radiation management technologies: The former can directly contribute to
the stabilisation of greenhouse gases. The latter could help to limit
indirect emissions from e.g. melting permafrost soils, and reduce the risks
from higher level of greenhouse gas concentrations. Some climate
engineering researchers argue against expanding the UNFCCC’s scope. As it
is the only significant framework mandated to prevent dangerous climate
change, we argue that it can, should, and is likely to become the forum to
govern the use of climate engineering technologies.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to