Hi all, there is a new article in *Climatic Change* on regional disparities in SRM impacts:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-015-1526-8 <http://www.springer.com/-/6/AVCb9QvvnYabzt6n3aIS> Our main point is that current assessments of regional disparities rest on a strong change-is-bad assumption, namely that, for all regions, any deviation from a past climate state inflicts damages. We challenge this strong change-is-bad assumption by showing that diverging preferences are not only plausible, but may also have the potential to substantially alter assessments of regional disparities. We argue that the underlying assumptions of current assessment frameworks deserve more attention. In our view, promising directions for future inquiry include bridging gaps to the general climate impact research and to research on the social implications of environmental change. Best, Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
