This has been in the newsletter but not on the list. Best
N --- Tang, M. J.; Keeble, J.; Telford, P. J.; Pope, F. D.; Braesicke, P.; Griffiths, P. T. et al. (2016): Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO2 with TiO2 and SiO2 aerosol particles. Implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering. In Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., pp. 1–42. DOI 10.5194/acp-2016-756. http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/acp-2016-756/ Abstract. Deliberate injection of aerosol particles into the stratosphere is a potential climate engineering scheme. Introduction of particles into the stratosphere would scatter solar radiation back to space, thereby reducing the temperature at the Earth’s surface and hence the impacts of global warming. Minerals such as TiO2 or SiO2 are among the potentially suitable aerosol materials for stratospheric particle injection due to their greater light scattering ability compared to stratospheric sulfuric acid particles. However, the heterogeneous reactivity of mineral particles towards trace gases important for stratospheric chemistry largely remains unknown, precluding reliable assessment of their impacts on stratospheric ozone which is of key environmental significance. In this work we have investigated for the first time the heterogeneous hydrolysis of ClONO2 on TiO2 and SiO2 aerosol particles at room temperature and at different relative humidities (RH), using an aerosol flow tube. The uptake coefficient, γ(ClONO2), on TiO2 was ~ 1.2 × 10−3 at 7 % and remaining unchanged at 33 % RH, and increased for SiO2 from ~ 2 × 10−4 at 7 % RH to ~ 5 × 10−4 at 35 % RH, reaching a value of ~ 6 × 10−4 at 59 % RH. We have also examined the impacts of a hypothetical TiO2 injection on stratospheric chemistry using the UKCA chemistry-climate model in which heterogeneous hydrolysis of N2O5 and ClONO2 on TiO2 particles is considered. A TiO2 injection scenario with a solar radiation scattering effect very similar to the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo was constructed. It is found that compared to the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo, TiO2 injection causes less ClOx activation and less ozone destruction in the lowermost stratosphere, while reduced depletion of N2O5 and NOx in the middle stratosphere results in decreased ozone levels. Overall, no significant difference in the vertically integrated ozone abundancies is found between TiO2 injection and the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. Future work required to further assess the impacts of TiO2 injection on stratospheric chemistry is also discussed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
