The prospect of Trump deep-sixing the Paris treaty highlights a 
pre-existing issue: the emission reduction targets are unachievable. The 
world economy is not a college marching band at a half-time show, which 
turns on a dime to march off in a different direction, drums beating. 

 

Most people involved realize this, but also know that it must be done to 
the extent possible, whatever else happens. You set “stretch goals”, make 
no concession before its time, and stay in formation.  And the agreement 
does provide milestones at which participants can officially & 
incrementally acknowledge the obvious, without being accused of bad faith. 
Adding CDR to the mix should, in theory, be a decorous process by which 
careful calls for negative emissions are issued according to the sanctioned 
timeline. If need be, solar geoengineering - wreathed in caveats - might 
someday be added to the agenda. (Until then, keep it strictly on the ‘down 
low’).  

 

But what if the biggest player withdraws? It’s no longer possible to 
pretend that the emissions targets are not absurd. And CDR has some of the 
same constraints as emissions reduction: multiple players, multiple 
untested candidate technologies, slow deployment, & high cost. If the US 
will no longer commit to emissions reduction it certainly will not commit 
to CDR, with similar results. Some players may despair and quietly 
consider, ‘ahead of schedule’,  solar geoengineering to save themselves 
until the U.S. comes to its senses (and let Trump deflect some of the 
blame).

 

I’m wary of the ‘Plan A, Plan B, Plan C’ framing, but I suspect that solar 
geoengineering just got a promotion closer to the head of the alphabet.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to