xx
> On May 4, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Andrew Lockley <andrew.lock...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/136610 > <https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/136610> > > Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon > Removal Potentials and Costs > Johnson, Katelyn; Martin, Derek; Zhang, Xilin... [more] > <https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/136610> > 2017 > Abstract: In 2015, nearly 190 countries came together > in the historic Paris agreement to take action in > minimizing the impacts of climate change. However, > even with the consensus to cut carbon emissions, the > continued trajectory of global emissions will push > global temperatures 2°C past pre-industrial temperatures. > Implementation of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) options is a > way to meet the target. Through an extensive literature > review, ten CDR/storage options were examined to gain a > better understanding of the current state of > research regarding the CDR potential of each > option and their relevant costs, as well as the > feasibility of their implementation. As we have concluded > that all options require significant further research, a > second major objective was to highlight where major > gaps in research exist in order to help guide further > inquiry in CDR options. Every option was examined > extensively and presented in an individual chapter. > Each chapter presents our findings regarding the > CDR/storage potential and economic costs collected for > each option. In addition, each chapter includes a > discussion of the technical or natural > process, geographic restrictions, policy implications, > benefits and risks associated with the > implementation, as well as recommendations for further > research. The biggest takeaways from the literature > review is that this set of CDR options offer > enough removal potential to warrant equal consideration to > other emission reduction measures, all options > face limitations and uncertainties so a diverse > portfolio of options should be pursued, and > implementation should occur in a staged manner, in which > options are implemented as they become feasible. [less] > <https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/136610> > Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136610 > <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136610> > Other Identifiers: 315 > Subject(s): carbon dioxide removal, negative emissions, climate change, CO2 > Show full item record > <https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/136610?show=full> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com > <mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering > <https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
