On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 03:55:54PM -0500, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > I would suggest "If you prefer troubles you can use the C++ interface" > to "Applications requiring API/ABI stability are encouraged to use the > C interface instead of the C++ interface."
I changed: << If you prefer troubles you can use the C++ interface. >> with: << If you don't care about adapting/rebuilding your client code you can still use the C++ interface. >> Your statement was already in previous statement: << The recommended low-level interface to the GEOS library is the simplified C wrapper interface. This will ensure stability of the API and the ABI of the library during performance improvements that will likely change classes definitions. >> --strk; Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer () ASCII Ribbon Campaign http://foo.keybit.net/~strk/services.html /\ Keep it simple! _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
