On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:55:16AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > > > On Sep 17, 2020, at 6:54 AM, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 01:25:39PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > >> > >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TDm2aR4a7O41-soS-25Xog1EdQcjmvKCnKltxjbxOC0/edit# > >> > > > >> * Despite worries, only one file in topology showed any differences. > >> topogeo_addlinestring.sql needs to be looked at by a topology expert, > >> Sandro do you think you could? > > > > A quick look suggests this is just a lack of normalization from > > the output of OverlayNG (did the old overlay normalize internally ?) > > No, neither normalizes, it's wasted overhead except in testing. Things just > come out of the graphs in different orders.
Well the result seem to be compatible, just different order, so this case could be threated like the other ones of expecting different results based on GEOS version. --strk; _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
