Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Interesting... I would have thought this check was already there as > well... oh well it cant hurt. If there is some wierd reason for the > check not being there wfs 1.1 cite tests should filter it out.. although > i cant imagine what it would be.
Well, eventually you'd have failed with an exception anyways, but not exactly the one you'd expect (NPE in the case where bbox was provided along with a wrong type name, for example). Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
