Quick question: - your diagram shows the existing persistence layer untouched? Is that still the case or can we replace it with something that is more simple to maintain .. reading further I see that appears to be future work. Your configuration persistence page currently only documents the XStream approach.
Comments: - ResourcePool idea is well presented, nice work Ignore if you want: - can you show the difference between some information we keep explicitly, like setName in your example, and how extra property settings are handled over time - may want to consider org.geoserver.repository.FeatureTypeInfo (ie change the package name) to avoid the use of the dreaded catalog word Cheers, Jody > Hi all, > > Here is the newest version of the configuration GSIP for your reading > pleasure. > > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+8+-+New+Configuration+System > > Questions/comments/feedback welcome. It would be nice to be able to vote > on this in next weeks IRC meeting. > > -Justin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
