It also sounds like some of the pressure is off on the GeoTools side of things; Eclesia and his team are moved off to a mercurial (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/) checkout for their work group. Note I would like to get a GeoTools release candidate out representing OSGeo graduation; my understanding is there a few more issues to close (and a board meeting Friday) before that becomes a reality.
Jody PS. I am trying to understand how this does not act like a branch and am drawing a blank :-) Perhaps I will need to try it... I wonder if it preserves team history when they eventually merge? Chris Holmes wrote: > Are we wanting another beta release? Or go for RC1 for our next > release? David is going through now and doing a bunch of hand testing > and trying to figure out how solid it is. This release is a bit > scary, since we've had two huge changes (feature model in gt2 and core > config in GS). RC1 will be nice since it'll get a lot more users > testing it, but we don't want to bring too much pain to them and scare > them away from RC testing in the future. > > Perhaps we could aim for a release at the middle of next week? And > it'll be ok if it slips to friday? > > Chris > > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Hi, >> do we have any specific target date for the RC1? This will >> affect the GeoTools 2.5.0-rc1 release, and of course the >> other GeoTools would like to know. >> >> Cheers >> Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
