Hi Arne, How do you want to go about including it? Like baking it directly into the release? I myself would like extensions to be kept as extensions, downloadable separately. However I am all for including an additional artifact with gwc "baked" in.
-Justin Arne Kepp wrote: > Hi, > > for the upcoming RC release of GeoServer 1.7.x we would really like to > include the GeoWebCache module to demonstrate new superoverlay > functionality (for Google Earth and other KML clients). > > Does anyone object / feel we need to go through a more formal process? > > It does not modify code in GeoServer, the memory footprint is tiny and > it uses HTTP to communicate with the core. If invoked, it creates a > "gwc" folder in the data directory or the temp directory. > > -Arne > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > !DSPAM:4007,4884e7ca296311804284693! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
