Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: > Anyways, while I do feel strongly about how we organize classes and > packages I am willing to wait and see what happens and re-organize later > if it is deemed necessary. I just ask that such things are kept in mind > and people remain open minded to a reorganization of the classes down > the road. What worries me is that it is a lot easier to mash things > together than to pull them apart. So trying to reorganize down the road > could prove difficult.
Ok, let's try the "one package per area" thing. What would it look like? - org.geoserver.web.wicket - org.geoserver.web.data.wicket and so on? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
