According to SourceForge, people are definitely downloading both extensions [1]. Not many, but > 0. So we should definitely let people know that we may be pulling the rug out from under them and see how loudly they protest.
Is it worth it to continue to publish the extensions with a large red warning label on them? [1] http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=25086&package_id=129885 Thanks, Mike Pumphrey OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Works for me. But outright removing them seems a bit harsh. It might be >> good to poll the users list first to ensure that indeed noone depends on >> them, since it is not that much of a hassle to have them around and tell >> people they are unsupported imho. > > I'm not much worried about the hassle per se, but the bad > image it gives us, first we list a functionality, when > people try to use it, it does not work at all and we > provide no support other than saying "yeah, it does not > work, it's not supported either". > > A poll works for me. Anyone else wants to share an opinion > on this? > Cheers > Andrea > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
